Threshold Network Token price

Thanks for the mention King @Ebubechi_GMI There's a lot to look at when trying to deep delve to build a solid bias on a project. Other than the tech the team is building, which 99% of the time CT really isn't using. You build an AI Agent that allows devs to launch coins, very few would really use it as most want to always have control of how they carry out their launches. So it boils down to the narratives, team, tokenomics, a means to generate revenue, and possibly the people publicly backing it. For tokenomics, sometimes it may look unhealthy at first glance. We could see a token have a 1bn supply and valued at 30m mcap, and a lot of people would see that as late or too high and write it off due to the higher numbers in supply. A fundamental analyst could look into the same supply and find out that only 5% of the total supply will be circulating for the next 6 months, team and VC tokens locked for maybe 1 year, and he may see that as early. Why? 5% of 1bn tokens is 50m tokens, being at 30m mcap possibly means the token is trading at $0.6. This also means that for the next 6 months, given that it is in a trending narrative, the team has all it takes to push it higher and possibly past $3 to $5, plus there is no fear of overly large supplies on the open chart. There is also the "New Shiny Coin" effect. For instance, looking at the energy sector in the market, $NKP (STILL UNDERVALUED) looked to be the next big runner for that sector and really got a decent team and founder working relentlessly. However, $OVPP launched barely a month ago and is already leading the narrative with their recent announcement of a partnership with the SEC causing an uprise up to 200m mcap last night. They have also gained the support of most of CT's top chads. Next bet is on the team, their experience, networks, and previous ecosystem success. One of which is a big protocol like @DioneProtocol openly supporting $OVPP pre-launch, and that was already a green flag for me as DIONE itself was a solid runner in its early stage and has kept building and doing very well as an ecosystem. Another of which is the EMP ecosystem led by @empyrealdev with projects like Talos gaining ground and getting mentioned by the likes of @ethereum @OffchainLabs. Now, you may wonder... How did $OVPP secure a partnership in the U.S with SEC? How did $T build their framework in the @OasisProtocol Tee and even partner with them? How did $T get a mention from the official ethereum X account, offchainlabs, and arbitrum account? How did $OPENX get a mention from @base It tells you that it is much more than just the utility or innovation these teams have to give; they also have a crazy load of connections and networks to secure the most timeline-breaking and fomo-building partnerships as part of their arsenals when building. Another keynote pointer to spot is the incubator or Agency running the show to help projects with visibility. I'm likely to take a project incubated by @DEXLaboratory4 as alpha due to his solid track record on projects incubated like $NEURAL, $VERTAI, and most recently $AVM (still cheap). The problem or blessing in disguise for Fundamental Analysts is they are sometimes too early or draw up too many pointers which at such times, the price does not actually reflect on the project and often times is looked away from till everyone comes back to fomo. In the image below, I front ran the launch of @talos_is and started building conviction in May, and even gave a lowered entry on $SIMMI back then too. Months later, offchain labs announced support and on launch I shared publicly sub 5m mcap, $T ran as high as 90m mcap. Imagine having to wait months for one launch, but then waiting for the right one👍. Yeah, fundamentals may be time-taking and not give the crazy 100xs from memecoins and degens, but it is worth it and can aid you in compounding wealth in crypto. i made some earlier content pieces on "how to research", you can check them below 👇